Which device from the lineup does the 1979 'reprogrammable manipulator' definition clearly leave out, even though almost everyone agrees it's a robot?
- A.The towel-folding robot — it has arms
- B.The Mars rover — it drives and explores, but it isn't a manipulator arm
- C.The RC airplane
- D.The canister vacuum
Answer Why?
Using sense–think–act, why isn't the RC airplane a robot?
- A.It can't fly high enough
- B.The human does the sensing and thinking — the plane only acts
- C.It has no motor
- D.It isn't reprogrammable
Answer Why?
Why can't NASA fly a Mars rover the way you'd fly the RC airplane?
- A.Mars has no radio
- B.The radio delay is minutes each way, so the rover must sense the ground and decide for itself
- C.Rovers have no motors
- D.It could — they just prefer not to
Answer Why?
A washing machine senses the load, follows cycle logic, and spins on its own. Under sense–think–act, what's the honest answer?
- A.Definitely not a robot — it doesn't move around
- B.It does all three in a simple, fixed way — so it sits at the low end of a robot spectrum, and the argument is the point
- C.Definitely a robot, exactly like a Mars rover
- D.It fails because it has no sensors
Answer Why?
Which of the three traits will you spend most of Module 1 on?
- A.Sense — reading sensors
- B.Act — making the robot drive, turn, and draw shapes
- C.Think — pathfinding algorithms
- D.None — Module 1 is all theory
Answer Why?